March 09, 2023 - BY Admin

Here's why some NFL players are lobbing accusations of collusion over Lamar Jackson

One year ago this week, two grand juries in Texas declined to prosecute Deshaun Watson on any charges relating to the several women who said Watson committed sexual assault or sexual misconduct while attempting to give them massages.


Many clubs, including the Carolina Panthers, Atlanta Falcons, and New Orleans Saints, leaped at the chance to trade for and sign Watson, who hadn't played in a complete season and was 28-25 as the Texans' starter with one postseason win at the time. The Cleveland Browns outbid everyone else, signing Watson to a five-year, $230 million contract with three first-round draft selections in exchange.


And yet, a year later, two of the three clubs who were after Watson and are still without a long-term quarterback are telling reporters, including Yahoo! Sports' Jori Epstein, that they've passed on Lamar Jackson. This comes only hours after the Baltimore Ravens applied a non-exclusive franchise tag to the quarterback, allowing any other club to make an offer and potentially sign him if the Ravens do not match.


When he was 23, Jackson became the NFL's second-ever unanimous MVP. In 45 of his 61 career starts, the Ravens have won. He turned 26 eight weeks ago and is widely regarded as a cornerstone in both his South Florida community and Baltimore. He is available for two first-round selections rather than the three Houston requested, and he has not been accused of sexual misconduct by more than two dozen women. So... he's not enticing to these QB-needy clubs, unlike Watson was?


If he has convinced Bisciotti and general manager Eric DeCosta that he deserves the same, if not a slightly better, deal than Watson as a league MVP with none of the baggage, he is 100% accurate. If the owner class is irritated with Haslam, don't invite him to whatever crazy Michelin-chef-catered-yacht-party-in-St. Tropez they have planned for April, and stop picking on Jackson and other players.


Of course, all of this was to be expected: the writing has long been on the wall, but if last week's eye-opening NFLPA player poll revealed anything, it's that a sizable proportion of these club owners don't care about winning, at least not on the field. They are just concerned about their own fortune.


Nothing in the collective bargaining agreement states that all contracts must be fully guaranteed. Team owners just refuse to do that, and appear to go to great lengths to ensure that it does not become the standard. There's also nothing preventing them from repealing the present law requiring teams to deposit all guaranteed contract funds in cash into an escrow account (though the structure of the Kansas City Chiefs' contract with Patrick Mahomes demonstrates that there are ways around that). They will not stop the practice because it would allow franchise owners with less capital to execute more agreements like the one Watson received.